Люди не должны больше сюда приезжать. Это грёбаная ловушка⁠⁠2

На реддите? Пфф, на фочане запостите. Там что угодно поддержут если это противоречит реддиту

Держи :) У меня нет там аккаунта, да и сраться нет никакого желания, один хрен забанят, но если вдруг кому-то очень хочется запостить, вот совсем слегка подредактированный текст.

If you're interested in war crimes, here is some info:

The fact is that hostilities are not war crime in themselfs. Deaths (including mass deaths) of civilians are not war crimes too as collateral damage is possible during war.

Destroying of civil buildings, cultural objects and so on - are not war crimes too if they're considered as legal targets.

Strictly speaking, almost all international laws about war crimes - is defining rules about what are legal targets and what are not.

For example, if some military using a house with civilians inside as firing point, then they commit a war crime (by covering a human shield) and then they should be considered as international terrorists. At the same time, the destruction of such firing point (even with civilians) - is not a war crime, because the firing point is a legal target.

Bombing cities - is not a war crime, because cities contain important infrastructure for military. Bridges, airfields and any other military objects - are legal targets too. At the same time, if there are threats for lives of civilians nearby - their deaths is not responsibility of attacker-side, but responsibility of defending side.

For example, Russians destroyed important communication objects in Kiev, but sent a several hours' warning about missile attack. After that, the Kiev authorities showed a footage that civilians were killed as a result of this attack. From the point of view of internation law, the Kiev authorities recorded their own war crime and from that moment can be equated with terrorists. We have here at least 2 law breaks: they didn't make sure that civilians will be in safe during the attack and they (goverment) used people as human shield.The first case could be, somehow, lighten to "criminal negligence" but the second one is definitely is terrorism.

Another example is giving of weapons to civilians. In war, people are divided into civilians, military (including registered partisans) and bandits. A civilian who has not enlisted in the military (at least as a partisan) consideres as bandit. The bandits have much less rights that military, e.g. soldiers cannot be killed if they surrendered, but bandits can.

Giving weapons on "take-it-by-passport" basis is a war crime as it vanishes the line between cilivians and the military and those who gave this criminal order, respectively, are accomplices, with all consequences.

It is also a war crime to address "no mercy for you" messages to the enemy side. That is, in fact, we see as Kiev goverment commits many war crimes, encourage their people to commit war crimes and do not record any war crimes of the Russian Federation. On the other hand, Russian army acts extremely carefull from a legal point of view: they avoid war crimes (keep in mind, Kharkov, Chernigov and Mariupol - are "legitimate targets", so their bombing is not a war crime) and at the same time they record all Ukranians army' war crimes very accurate.

Criminal cases have been initiated about the execution by Ukranian army of medical staff who treated Russian soldiers in Volnovakha, about missile attacks on residental facilities in demilitarized zones or simply in areas without any hostilites (for example, bombing buildings near Belgorod).

So what could be the result of the trial over the hostilities in Ukraine in the international criminal court?

As I can see, it will be extremely problematic to prove the illegality of the military actions thamselfs. But as for war crimes, so far we see great amount of proven (at least recorded) war crimes from the Ukraninan side, and almost no proofs of the Russians side war crimes.

One can find much more another examples of war crimes in Ukranian telegram channels. Recently I san footage from Mariupol where Russian tanks firing at some civil building, and then the victims are showed. But if you look the full footage, you can notice, that someone shooting from this building, which makes it "legal target", so what you actually see on the footage - is a fixation of war crime, because "Azov" used human shield to protect their firing point, which is direct violation of the Geneva Convention.

Запингуйте кто-нить, кто решит такое выложить там и сделайте тут пост о комментариях в новости реддита.

Рвотные

В сабе рекабу смысла нет, контингент в основном тот же как в 2х следующих, в таких как либерта, украина, забанят моментом, НоЛавРус тебя расцелуют за такой материал (но саб маленький), в англоязычных всё ещё грустнее.