Это вам не Шостакович⁠⁠

Но польская радиостанция это сообщила или нет? Чей фактчек нужен. Может вчера запретили а сегодня часть разрешили так как директор по случайности оказался хохлом. Вот что думает Гонконгское издание по этому поводу

Many domestic media reported that, affected by the Russian-Ukrainian war, many European countries participated in "sanctioning Russia". Polish cultural institutions "banned" the works of Tchaikovsky, Shostakovich and Chekhov.
The suspicious point of this report lies in the words "since then". The latter part does not seem to be a fact, but an explanatory extension. On the website of TOK FM radio station in Poland, we checked relevant reports and found that there is a big discrepancy between facts and rumors.
The so-called Polish cultural institution is not a government agency such as the "Ministry of Culture", but the "Pomeranian Philharmonic Orchestra". On February 22, before the war began, the orchestra hired a conductor from Ukraine as its artistic director. After the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian war, the director said that he could not see himself and the "Russian name" appearing on the performance poster.
The director of the orchestra expressed his support, and the theater will no longer perform works by Tchaikovsky, Shostakovich and others. It was a "little gesture", the person in charge said in a radio interview, and he himself is a fan of Shostakovich, who called him "one of the greatest composers of all time." one."
This is the origin news of this "out of the ban". The exact expression is that a Polish orchestra will not perform works by Russian composers such as Tchaikovsky and Shostakovich in the short term, considering the feelings of the newly hired artistic director. We can interpret this as a form of "boycott" of Russia by the band.
This kind of "boycott" is private and individual, but it does not mean that the Polish government or cultural management department is "banning performances".
For an orchestra or an artist, there is the right to choose the repertoire. Considering the particularity of this orchestra, in order to take care of the feelings of the artistic director, this choice is understandable.
This "understanding" is to admit that the orchestra has the right not to perform. Of course, the exercise of this right is somewhat regrettable. Don't say that "art has no borders" has always been the consensus of the global cultural community including the West, not to perform Tchaikovsky and Shostakovich, after all, is a loss for a "philharmonic orchestra", It is also a loss for music fans-in any case, the two masters who have long become historical figures have no responsibility for this war, and their works are treasures of human art.
We have also seen that in the past two days, when the Chinese media reported the news of "banning Tchaikovsky", many of them tended to be biased and exaggerated, causing some kind of misleading to readers. In addition to "Poland banned Tchaikovsky", there is also "Italy banned Dostoevsky in class", which is also an exaggeration. There have been reports that this was the personal behaviour of a teacher and that it has been "corrected".
European countries are sanctioning Russia, which has affected the arts, culture and sports to some extent. When dealing with such rumors, attention should be paid to distinguishing two levels of facts:
First, who is "banning", is it a government order, or is it a "boycott" at the individual level? If it is an individual, it is more about the "emotional needs" of the individual. You can not appreciate it, but you cannot criticize it too much; if it is a government order, it involves the "double standard" of values and the issue of cultural freedom. .
Second, is the boycott of people and organizations related to Russian politics at a real level, or a symbolic figure like "Tchaikovsky"? If it is to ban Russian national-level orchestras with Russian government funding background, then the boycott may have its own realistic basis. To ban historical figures like Tchaikovsky can only be an absurd "joke".
We hope that art can be properly separated from politics and maintain valuable independence, but the real situation is always complicated.
The Munich Philharmonic fired Russian conductor Gergiev on the grounds that Gergiev had publicly supported Putin in the past and helped Putin in his election. Munich asked Gergiev to state that he would no longer support Putin; Gergiev refused After that, the band finally chose to terminate the contract with him. It is a pity to terminate the contract, but the relationship between Gergiev and Putin is political in itself. After Germany announced sanctions against Putin and Russia, it is a problem whether Gergiev can serve as the commander-in-chief again.
Although every "boycott" case has such a tortuous story; on the whole, European culture and sports are showing a posture of alienating Russia, which is an indisputable fact. Compared with the art world, the "prohibition" in the sports industry is more clear. Both the International Olympic Committee and FIFA have announced plans to sanction Russia.
This is of course a pity. Europe, the United States and Russia have shown a trend of "total war", not only militarily, but also socially and culturally.
Perhaps, the world is undergoing some kind of turning point. This has to be said to be a kind of sadness. You know, openness has always been a hallmark of modern civilization, and musicians like Tchaikovsky and Shostakovich are already "world heritage", not just "Russian national art". We can only demand peace as soon as possible in the name of art.

У тебя камент а не пост. И ни одного аргумента кроме fud "все фейки".

Может и не запретили ничего, просто сказали. Поляки и от газа уже отказались "но потом"

никак, это в принципе