Наградили за краденый снимок и озадачились...⁠⁠

Тот кусок английского текста, что я тут в комментах выложила написан уже после длительной сессии общения с ними.
Вот "горяченькое", только что отправила)) Все ли плохо с английским, на Ваш взгляд?

Ok, let me describe my position other words.
We have legal problem and we have ethic problem.

Legal problem:

I am the citizen of Russian Federation. I am the author of shot "Capitalism". I sell this image all over the world. I didn't contesting MOF. I din't knew about MOF existence till this case.

One day I saw that

1. OblaFotograf and TFSF (as an legal entites) published my shot under someone name.

2. FIAP (as an legal entity) awarded my shot.

I don't know where Olba took my shot, really. Maybe Mr. Kavaz, maybe somebody else stole it. I am not a police, I haven't personal data of Kavaz.

We have two illegal issues:

"Publishing and distribution of illegal content",

"authorship misappropriation".

Both issues list in a criminal law codex.

I shouldn't know about Olba (Fiap, Tfsf) inner regulations and rules.

If both your organisations sure that you haven't any liability - ok, let's police determine the truth

(for example, accordance of inner contest rules to national law).

So, our legal problem is a police case.

Ethic problem:

Fiap and Olba and Tfsf declares grand rhetoric;

Fiap proud of connection with Unesco... But practically, I see that all of you just want to evade responsibility.

What would I do at your place?

1. I would recoznised a mistake publicly. (other people must be sure in Your reliability)

2. I wold apologised publicly. (because my photo demonstrated publicly)

3. I would redirect a prize to real author (it is not ordinary case, so standard rules unsuitable).

4. I would offer my help to author with theft punishment (it is just honorable).

If I had seen your friendly and rightful relation to me, apologising would be enough. But... I read "it is not my problem", "it is not our liability". It is really far from ethic and far from gentlemen behaviour.

Who is the bad person? Ethically, all of you organisations, unfortunately.

Kavaz (if he really exist) is just a silly man.